The project file specifies <Platforms>x64</Platforms>, which may conflict with ARM64 builds. While dotnet publish without an explicit runtime identifier can auto-detect the target platform in Docker, this constraint might cause build issues or prevent proper ARM64 compilation. Consider either removing this constraint or adding explicit runtime identifier arguments to the publish command (e.g., --runtime linux-arm64 for ARM64 builds). Alternatively, you could verify that the multi-arch build actually produces native ARM64 binaries rather than running x64 binaries through emulation.

The project file specifies <Platforms>x64</Platforms>, which may conflict with ARM64 builds. While dotnet publish without an explicit runtime identifier can auto-detect the target platform in Docker, this constraint might cause build issues or prevent proper ARM64 compilation. Consider either removing this constraint or adding explicit runtime identifier arguments to the publish command (e.g., --runtime linux-arm64 for ARM64 builds). Alternatively, you could verify that the multi-arch build actually produces native ARM64 binaries rather than running x64 binaries through emulation.

The build action doesn't configure Docker layer caching, which can significantly improve build times, especially for multi-architecture builds. Consider adding cache-from and cache-to parameters to leverage GitHub Actions cache. For example:

cache-from: type=gha
cache-to: type=gha,mode=max

This will cache Docker layers between builds and speed up subsequent builds.

The build action doesn't configure Docker layer caching, which can significantly improve build times, especially for multi-architecture builds. Consider adding cache-from and cache-to parameters to leverage GitHub Actions cache. For example:

cache-from: type=gha
cache-to: type=gha,mode=max

This will cache Docker layers between builds and speed up subsequent builds.

The Docker image is only tagged with latest, which makes it difficult to track versions and roll back if needed. Consider adding versioning tags based on git SHA, tag, or semantic version. For example, you could add tags like ghcr.io/${{ github.repository_owner }}/mcp-gateway:${{ github.sha }} or use docker/metadata-action to automatically generate appropriate tags.

The Docker image is only tagged with latest, which makes it difficult to track versions and roll back if needed. Consider adding versioning tags based on git SHA, tag, or semantic version. For example, you could add tags like ghcr.io/${{ github.repository_owner }}/tool-gateway:${{ github.sha }} or use docker/metadata-action to automatically generate appropriate tags.

The Docker container is running as root user, which poses a security risk. The sample Dockerfiles in this repository (e.g., sample-servers/mcp-example/Dockerfile:4-24) create and switch to a non-root user. Consider adding a similar security measure by creating a non-root user and switching to it before the ENTRYPOINT.

The Docker container is running as root user, which poses a security risk. The sample Dockerfiles in this repository (e.g., sample-servers/mcp-example/Dockerfile:4-24) create and switch to a non-root user. Consider adding a similar security measure by creating a non-root user and switching to it before the ENTRYPOINT.